US contradictory messages to Iran; Policy disagreement or negotiation trick?

Mehr News Agency, International Group: In the first weeks of the year, there was a basis for indirect dialogue between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States. The first round of these negotiations was held on April 5 (April 1) in Muscat, the capital of Oman, with the mediation of the country informally and behind closed doors. The meeting, which was held in silence, was dedicated to the exchange of messages and measuring the readiness of the parties to resume the diplomacy process.

Subsequently, the second round of negotiations was held in Rome, Italy, on April 5, with Oman hosting and mediation. Reports indicate that the general atmosphere of the negotiations has been positive and that the third round of these conversations is to be re -held in Muscat in the coming days. The attachment of these three sessions indicates a slow but continuous attempt to open the nodes in Tehran and Washington.

However, the positive atmosphere of the negotiations has been accompanied by a set of contradictory statements and contradictory actions by US officials. From the sudden change in the right to enrich Iran, to the simultaneous implementation of new sanctions, the insistence on direct negotiations while the conversations continue indirectly, and so on, all of the signs of strategic instability and ...
[Short citation of 8% of the original article]